RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00162
INDEX CODE: 107.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in
Vietnam.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He received the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for the
time he served, 1 November 1961 through 7 July 1965, in Saigon
with the XXXXX Air Police Squadron. He is being denied service
connection by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for Agent
Orange exposure while he was in Vietnam.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of
his DD Form 214, an excerpt of his Air Force Form 7, Airmen
Military Record, an excerpt of Air Force Pamphlet 900-2, and a
letter from the Montana DVA office.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 13 July 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force
at the age of 18 and was progressively promoted to the grade of
airman second class (E-3) with a date of rank of 1 October 1962.
The applicant was honorably discharged on 7 July 1965. He
served a total of 3 years, 11 months, and 25 days on active duty
with 1 year, 3 months, and 23 days of foreign service.
The applicants DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the Air
Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA), Air Force Good Conduct
Medal (AFGCM), and the AFEM.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicants request. DPAPP
states the applicants DD Form 214 does reflect his award of the
AFEM, but there are no documents in his records that confirm any
Vietnam service. His records also reflect that he served an
overseas tour from 10 March 1964 through 22 April 1965 in
Okinawa, assigned to the XXXXX Air Police Squadron (APS), and
then the XXXX APS when the XXXXX was deactivated. Since the
temporary duty (TDY) in question would have been served while he
was already overseas, it would not affect the amount of Foreign
Service reflected on his DD Form 214. In addition, the actual
overseas location is not an authorized entry for the DD Form
214. Since there was no documentation confirming his Vietnam
service, DPAPP wrote him on 4 February 2008, requesting that he
make one last check of his personal documents to see if he had
anything that would verify his Vietnam service. He responded on
13 February 2008; however, he provided no documents of
verification. The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) was created on
8 July 1965. Those members that served in Vietnam prior to that
date received the AFEM. Based on his award of the AFEM and the
locations and time frames for which it had been awarded, it
certainly appears that the applicant served in Vietnam, but this
cannot be confirmed with 100% certainty nor can the location or
the number of days served.
The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicants request.
DPSIDR states the AFEM is awarded to military personnel for
operations approved by the Department of Defense or the Joint
Staff. To confirm entitlement to the AFEM, an applicant must
provide a source document (travel voucher, TDY orders, etc.) to
verify their participation in an operation approved for the
AFEM.
DPSIDR states that after a thorough review of the applicants
record, they were unable to locate documents to verify he was
deployed to Vietnam. Additionally, the applicant did not
provide documentation to substantiate his claim.
The DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
on 23 May 2008, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E).
As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence
that the applicant served in Vietnam. We note he was awarded
the AFEM; however, his records do not contain, nor has the
applicant provided, any documentary evidence to substantiate his
claim that the AFEM he received was awarded for time he served
in Vietnam. However, due to the unique situation of the
applicant, we would be inclined to reconsider his request should
he be able to provide any additional evidence to verify boots
on the ground, including service medical records or eyewitness
accounts of his service in Vietnam. Without evidence to the
contrary, we agree with the opinions and recommendations from
the Air Force offices of primary responsibility that the
applicant is not a victim of an error or injustice. In view of
the above, we find no basis to favorably consider this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 17 July 2008, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-00162:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Dec 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 4 Feb 08.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 29 Apr 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 13 May 08.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 May 08.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03303
DPAPP states based on their review of his personnel record, they could not find any documents showing he was TDY or assigned to Vietnam. The Office of Directorate of Assignments requested additional information to verify his assignment to Vietnam, he did not respond to the request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03738
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03738 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSIDR states the applicant was awarded the Air Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) which is annotated on his DD Form 214. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01604
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01604 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for his involvement in the 1958 Taiwan crisis. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02842
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant responded stating it is unfortunate records covering the period he served on active duty are not maintained. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02837
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02837 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam, and entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553
DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicants TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02920
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records reflect he enlisted on active duty on 29 April 1961. DPSIDR states after a thorough review of the applicant's military records, they are unable to verify the applicant was in Vietnam. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03763
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. There are no documents or evidence within his records that reflect he served in Vietnam. However, after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the VSM.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00178
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, a copy of a document extracted from his military personnel records and a notarized letter from a former coworker attesting to his service in the Republic of Vietnam. No documentation was provided to verify the applicant served in Vietnam, or any area for which the VSM is authorized for the specified period of time. We believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam based on the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04289
The VSM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who served at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, their contiguous waters, or the airspaces there over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Although the applicant received the VSM and RVCM, the award of these decorations did not require his actual presence in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...